lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 3 Jun 2014 15:44:54 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] perf tools: Cache dso data file descriptor

On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 07:39:09AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 6/2/14, 3:18 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >+static rlim_t get_fd_limit(void)
> >+{
> >+	struct rlimit l;
> >+	rlim_t limit = 0;
> >+
> >+	/* Allow half of the current open fd limit. */
> >+	if (getrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &l) == 0) {
> >+		if (l.rlim_cur == RLIM_INFINITY)
> >+			limit = l.rlim_cur;
> 
> 
> Why not limit this to something reasonable -- 512 or 1024 -- rather
> "infinity" (~0UL).

hum, if there's no limit for the user at the first place
why limit him in the perf..?

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ