lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:19:09 -0700
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
CC:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mitchel Humpherys <mitchelh@...eaurora.org>,
	Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
	Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] coccinelle: Check for missing NULL terminators in
 of_device_id tables

On 06/03/14 11:14, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
>> On 06/03/14 03:15, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>> Failure to terminate an of_device_id table can lead to confusing
>>> failures depending on where the compiler places the array. Add a
>>> check to make sure these tables are terminated. Thanks to Mitchel
>>> Humpherys for coming up with the pattern initially.
>>>
>>> Cc: Mitchel Humpherys <mitchelh@...eaurora.org>
>>> Cc: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
>>> Cc: Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>
>>> Cc: Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>
>>> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
>>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
>>> Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
>>> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> v3: Removed unneeded rule bad_of_table.  Placed * in context rule on the 
>>> closing brace; putting it on the field caused all fields to be marked.
>>>
>>
>> These seem like only minor changes. Why was my authorship removed?
> Probably because I don't know how to provide a new vesion of the patch 
> properly.  What should I have done? 

If you use git format-patch it should insert a "From: <original author>"
line at the beginning of the commit text. This ensures that when git am
is used the correct authorship is retained. It looks like you're using
alpine so I suspect you could just paste this information at the
beginning of the message.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ