| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 17:38:23 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip ] [BUGFIX] perf/probe: Fix perf probe to find
correct variable DIE
Em Thu, May 29, 2014 at 09:39:14PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> Hi Arnaldo,
>
> Here is the patch which fixes perf probe to find variable
> location correctly, on the recent dwarf format. This is not
> related to the SEGV issue which I fixed in previous mail.
Hey, if I apply just this one I got my problem solved, i.e. no more
segfaults and also I managed to add that problem, the variable is there,
all works, why do I need the first one?
Without your two patches:
[root@zoo ~]# perf probe 'vfs_getname=getname_flags:65 pathname=result->name:string'
Added new event:
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
[root@zoo ~]#
With this ([BUGFIX] perf/probe: Fix perf probe to find correct variable DIE):
Trying to reference a bogus variable, one that is not available at this
function:
Removed event: probe:vfs_getname
[root@zoo ~]# perf probe 'vfs_getname=getname_flags:65 pathname=BOGUS->name:string'
Failed to find 'BOGUS' in this function.
Error: Failed to add events. (-2)
[root@zoo ~]#
Perfect!
Now trying to reference a bogus member name:
[root@zoo ~]# perf probe 'vfs_getname=getname_flags:65 pathname=result->BOGUS:string'
result(type:filename) has no member BOGUS.
Failed to find 'result' in this function.
Error: Failed to add events. (-22)
[root@zoo ~]#
No segfault, albeit it produces a bogus error message, as it clearly
_finds_ the 'result' variable, its just that it is of a struct type that
_has_ no such 'BOGUS' _member_.
Also I suggest removing that last "Error:" line, what is its value for
users or developers?
Now if I do it all correctly:
[root@zoo ~]# perf probe 'vfs_getname=getname_flags:65 pathname=result->name:string'
Added new event:
probe:vfs_getname (on getname_flags:65 with pathname=result->name:string)
You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:
perf record -e probe:vfs_getname -aR sleep 1
[root@zoo ~]#
Ok, it works again!
And if I try to use it:
[root@zoo ~]# perf record -e probe:vfs_getname -a sleep 1
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.562 MB perf.data (~24570 samples) ]
[root@zoo ~]# perf script | head -5
perf 716 [000] 17842.271777: probe:vfs_getname: (ffffffff811c2e43) pathname="/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/sleep"
perf 716 [000] 17842.271794: probe:vfs_getname: (ffffffff811c2e43) pathname="/usr/lib64/ccache/sleep"
perf 716 [000] 17842.271800: probe:vfs_getname: (ffffffff811c2e43) pathname="/usr/local/sbin/sleep"
perf 716 [000] 17842.271804: probe:vfs_getname: (ffffffff811c2e43) pathname="/usr/local/bin/sleep"
perf 716 [000] 17842.271808: probe:vfs_getname: (ffffffff811c2e43) pathname="/sbin/sleep"
[root@zoo ~]#
Works as expected.
So no segfault anywhere, while if I apply just that one that fixes the segfault I get:
[root@zoo ~]# perf probe 'vfs_getname=getname_flags:65 pathname=result->name:string'
Failed to find the location of result at this address.
Perhaps, it has been optimized out.
Failed to find 'result' in this function.
Error: Failed to add events. (-22)
[root@zoo ~]#
It doesn't work, which is a regression, as applying just the first one allows
us to retrieve that variable.
[root@zoo ~]# perf probe -V getname_flags:65
Available variables at getname_flags:65
@<getname_flags+227>
char* filename
int len
int* empty
long int max
struct filename* result
[root@zoo ~]#
I.e. applying just the one that fixes just the segfault:
perf probe: Fix a segfault if asked for variable it doesn't find
"Fixes" the segfault but introduces a regression.
Can we apply just this one:
perf probe: Fix to find correct variable DIE
Because even when we specify a "variable that it doesn't find", it works well.
Regards,
- Arnaldo
> Thank you,
>
> (2014/05/29 21:19), Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > Fix perf probe to find correct variable DIE which has location or
> > external instance by tracking down the lexical blocks.
> >
> > Current die_find_variable() expects that the all variable DIEs
> > which has DW_TAG_variable have a location. However, since recent
> > dwarf information may have declaration variable DIEs at the
> > entry of function (subprogram), die_find_variable() returns it.
> >
> > To solve this problem, it must track down the DIE tree to find
> > a DIE which has an actual location or a reference for external
> > instance.
> >
> > e.g. finding a DIE which origin is <0xdc73>;
> >
> > <1><11496>: Abbrev Number: 95 (DW_TAG_subprogram)
> > <11497> DW_AT_abstract_origin: <0xdc42>
> > <1149b> DW_AT_low_pc : 0x1850
> > [...]
> > <2><114cc>: Abbrev Number: 119 (DW_TAG_variable) <- this is a declaration
> > <114cd> DW_AT_abstract_origin: <0xdc73>
> > <2><114d1>: Abbrev Number: 119 (DW_TAG_variable)
> > [...]
> > <3><115a7>: Abbrev Number: 105 (DW_TAG_lexical_block)
> > <115a8> DW_AT_ranges : 0xaa0
> > <4><115ac>: Abbrev Number: 96 (DW_TAG_variable) <- this has a location
> > <115ad> DW_AT_abstract_origin: <0xdc73>
> > <115b1> DW_AT_location : 0x486c (location list)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
> > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> > Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c | 7 +++++--
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c b/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c
> > index 7defd77..cc66c40 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c
> > @@ -747,14 +747,17 @@ struct __find_variable_param {
> > static int __die_find_variable_cb(Dwarf_Die *die_mem, void *data)
> > {
> > struct __find_variable_param *fvp = data;
> > + Dwarf_Attribute attr;
> > int tag;
> >
> > tag = dwarf_tag(die_mem);
> > if ((tag == DW_TAG_formal_parameter ||
> > tag == DW_TAG_variable) &&
> > - die_compare_name(die_mem, fvp->name))
> > + die_compare_name(die_mem, fvp->name) &&
> > + /* Does the DIE have location information or external instance? */
> > + (dwarf_attr(die_mem, DW_AT_external, &attr) ||
> > + dwarf_attr(die_mem, DW_AT_location, &attr)))
> > return DIE_FIND_CB_END;
> > -
> > if (dwarf_haspc(die_mem, fvp->addr))
> > return DIE_FIND_CB_CONTINUE;
> > else
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Masami HIRAMATSU
> Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
> Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
> E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists