lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed,  4 Jun 2014 16:23:13 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
	Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.14 164/228] iwlwifi: mvm: fix setting channel in monitor mode

3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>

commit 1c4abec0baf25ffb92a28cc99d4231feeaa4d3f3 upstream.

There was a deadlock in monitor mode when we were setting the
channel if the channel was not 1.

======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
3.14.3 #4 Not tainted
-------------------------------------------------------
iw/3323 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&local->chanctx_mtx){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa062e2f2>] ieee80211_vif_release_channel+0x42/0xb0 [mac80211]

but task is already holding lock:
 (&local->iflist_mtx){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0609e0a>] ieee80211_set_monitor_channel+0x5a/0x1b0 [mac80211]

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #2 (&local->iflist_mtx){+.+...}:
       [<ffffffff810d95bb>] __lock_acquire+0xb3b/0x13b0
       [<ffffffff810d9ee0>] lock_acquire+0xb0/0x1f0
       [<ffffffff817eb9c8>] mutex_lock_nested+0x78/0x4f0
       [<ffffffffa06225cf>] ieee80211_iterate_active_interfaces+0x2f/0x60 [mac80211]
       [<ffffffffa0518189>] iwl_mvm_recalc_multicast+0x49/0xa0 [iwlmvm]
       [<ffffffffa051822e>] iwl_mvm_configure_filter+0x4e/0x70 [iwlmvm]
       [<ffffffffa05e6d43>] ieee80211_configure_filter+0x153/0x5f0 [mac80211]
       [<ffffffffa05e71f5>] ieee80211_reconfig_filter+0x15/0x20 [mac80211]
       [snip]

-> #1 (&mvm->mutex){+.+.+.}:
       [<ffffffff810d95bb>] __lock_acquire+0xb3b/0x13b0
       [<ffffffff810d9ee0>] lock_acquire+0xb0/0x1f0
       [<ffffffff817eb9c8>] mutex_lock_nested+0x78/0x4f0
       [<ffffffffa0517246>] iwl_mvm_add_chanctx+0x56/0xe0 [iwlmvm]
       [<ffffffffa062ca1e>] ieee80211_new_chanctx+0x13e/0x410 [mac80211]
       [<ffffffffa062d953>] ieee80211_vif_use_channel+0x1c3/0x5a0 [mac80211]
       [<ffffffffa06035ab>] ieee80211_add_virtual_monitor+0x1ab/0x6b0 [mac80211]
       [<ffffffffa06052ea>] ieee80211_do_open+0xe6a/0x15a0 [mac80211]
       [<ffffffffa0605a79>] ieee80211_open+0x59/0x60 [mac80211]
       [snip]

-> #0 (&local->chanctx_mtx){+.+.+.}:
       [<ffffffff810d6cb7>] check_prevs_add+0x977/0x980
       [<ffffffff810d95bb>] __lock_acquire+0xb3b/0x13b0
       [<ffffffff810d9ee0>] lock_acquire+0xb0/0x1f0
       [<ffffffff817eb9c8>] mutex_lock_nested+0x78/0x4f0
       [<ffffffffa062e2f2>] ieee80211_vif_release_channel+0x42/0xb0 [mac80211]
       [<ffffffffa0609ec3>] ieee80211_set_monitor_channel+0x113/0x1b0 [mac80211]
       [<ffffffffa058fb37>] cfg80211_set_monitor_channel+0x77/0x2b0 [cfg80211]
       [<ffffffffa056e0b2>] __nl80211_set_channel+0x122/0x140 [cfg80211]
       [<ffffffffa0581374>] nl80211_set_wiphy+0x284/0xaf0 [cfg80211]
       [snip]

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &local->chanctx_mtx --> &mvm->mutex --> &local->iflist_mtx

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&local->iflist_mtx);
                               lock(&mvm->mutex);
                               lock(&local->iflist_mtx);
  lock(&local->chanctx_mtx);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

This deadlock actually occurs:
INFO: task iw:3323 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
      Not tainted 3.14.3 #4
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
iw              D ffff8800c8afcd80  4192  3323   3322 0x00000000
 ffff880078fdb7e0 0000000000000046 ffff8800c8afcd80 ffff880078fdbfd8
 00000000001d5540 00000000001d5540 ffff8801141b0000 ffff8800c8afcd80
 ffff880078ff9e38 ffff880078ff9e38 ffff880078ff9e40 0000000000000246
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff817ea841>] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x31/0x80
 [<ffffffff817ebaed>] mutex_lock_nested+0x19d/0x4f0
 [<ffffffffa06225cf>] ? ieee80211_iterate_active_interfaces+0x2f/0x60 [mac80211]
 [<ffffffffa06225cf>] ? ieee80211_iterate_active_interfaces+0x2f/0x60 [mac80211]
 [<ffffffffa052a680>] ? iwl_mvm_power_mac_update_mode+0xc0/0xc0 [iwlmvm]
 [<ffffffffa06225cf>] ieee80211_iterate_active_interfaces+0x2f/0x60 [mac80211]
 [<ffffffffa0529357>] _iwl_mvm_power_update_binding+0x27/0x80 [iwlmvm]
 [<ffffffffa0516eb1>] iwl_mvm_unassign_vif_chanctx+0x81/0xc0 [iwlmvm]
 [<ffffffffa062d3ff>] __ieee80211_vif_release_channel+0xdf/0x470 [mac80211]
 [<ffffffffa062e2fa>] ieee80211_vif_release_channel+0x4a/0xb0 [mac80211]
 [<ffffffffa0609ec3>] ieee80211_set_monitor_channel+0x113/0x1b0 [mac80211]
 [<ffffffffa058fb37>] cfg80211_set_monitor_channel+0x77/0x2b0 [cfg80211]
 [<ffffffffa056e0b2>] __nl80211_set_channel+0x122/0x140 [cfg80211]
 [<ffffffffa0581374>] nl80211_set_wiphy+0x284/0xaf0 [cfg80211]

This fixes https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75541

Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/mac80211.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/mac80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/mac80211.c
@@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ static void iwl_mvm_mc_iface_iterator(vo
 	memcpy(cmd->bssid, vif->bss_conf.bssid, ETH_ALEN);
 	len = roundup(sizeof(*cmd) + cmd->count * ETH_ALEN, 4);
 
-	ret = iwl_mvm_send_cmd_pdu(mvm, MCAST_FILTER_CMD, CMD_SYNC, len, cmd);
+	ret = iwl_mvm_send_cmd_pdu(mvm, MCAST_FILTER_CMD, CMD_ASYNC, len, cmd);
 	if (ret)
 		IWL_ERR(mvm, "mcast filter cmd error. ret=%d\n", ret);
 }
@@ -812,7 +812,7 @@ static void iwl_mvm_recalc_multicast(str
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mvm->mcast_filter_cmd))
 		return;
 
-	ieee80211_iterate_active_interfaces(
+	ieee80211_iterate_active_interfaces_atomic(
 		mvm->hw, IEEE80211_IFACE_ITER_NORMAL,
 		iwl_mvm_mc_iface_iterator, &iter_data);
 }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ