linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/7] lib/random32.c: Remove excess calls to prandom_u32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 08 Jun 2014 14:11:06 +0200
From:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To:	George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>
CC:	davem@...emloft.net, shemminger@...l.org, tytso@....edu,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hannes@...essinduktion.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] lib/random32.c: Remove excess calls to prandom_u32_state
 in initialization

On 06/07/2014 10:20 AM, George Spelvin wrote:
> Unrolling code in single-use code paths is just silly.  There are two
> instances:
>
> 1) prandom_warmup() calls 10 times.
> 2) prandom_state_selftest() can avoid one call and simplify the
>     loop logic by repeating an assignment to a local variable
>     (that probably adds zero code anyway)
>
> Signed-off-by: George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>

Fine by me although we simply resembled initialization code from
GSL here. I think that your subject line is a bit misleading though.

> ---
>   lib/random32.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/random32.c b/lib/random32.c
> index 4da5d281..2e7c15c0 100644
> --- a/lib/random32.c
> +++ b/lib/random32.c
> @@ -134,17 +134,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(prandom_bytes);
>
>   static void prandom_warmup(struct rnd_state *state)
>   {
> +	int i;
> +
>   	/* Calling RNG ten times to satify recurrence condition */
> -	prandom_u32_state(state);
> -	prandom_u32_state(state);
> -	prandom_u32_state(state);
> -	prandom_u32_state(state);
> -	prandom_u32_state(state);
> -	prandom_u32_state(state);
> -	prandom_u32_state(state);
> -	prandom_u32_state(state);
> -	prandom_u32_state(state);
> -	prandom_u32_state(state);
> +	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++)
> +		prandom_u32_state(state);
>   }
>
>   static void prandom_seed_very_weak(struct rnd_state *state, u32 seed)
> @@ -433,14 +427,15 @@ static void __init prandom_state_selftest(void)
>
>   	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test2); i++) {
>   		struct rnd_state state;
> +		u32 result;
>
>   		prandom_seed_very_weak(&state, test2[i].seed);
>   		prandom_warmup(&state);
>
> -		for (j = 0; j < test2[i].iteration - 1; j++)
> -			prandom_u32_state(&state);
> +		for (j = 0; j < test2[i].iteration; j++)
> +			result = prandom_u32_state(&state);
>
> -		if (test2[i].result != prandom_u32_state(&state))
> +		if (test2[i].result != result)
>   			errors++;
>
>   		runs++;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/