linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] mfd: cros_ec: Sync to the latest cros_ec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Jun 2014 12:37:48 +0200
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Bill Richardson <wfrichar@...omium.org>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	swarren@...dia.com, wsa@...-dreams.de, abrestic@...omium.org,
	dgreid@...omium.org, olof@...om.net, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] mfd: cros_ec: Sync to the latest
 cros_ec_commands.h from EC sources

On Tue, 2014-05-20 at 09:46 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > From: Bill Richardson <wfrichar@...omium.org>
> > 
> > This just updates include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h to match the
> > latest EC version (which is the One True Source for such things).  See
> > <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/platform/ec>
> > 
> > [dianders: took today's ToT version from the Chromium OS EC; deleted
> > references to cros_ec_dev and cros_ec_lpc since those aren't upstream
> > yet]
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bill Richardson <wfrichar@...omium.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>
> > Tested-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>
> > Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v3: None
> > Changes in v2: None
> > 
> >  drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c                |    2 +-
> >  include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h          |    4 +-
> >  include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h | 1128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  3 files changed, 1059 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
> 
> Applied, thanks.

This patch is included in linux-next since next-20140521. I'm not sure
why I waited three weeks before sending this question...

> > [...]
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h
> > index 86fd069..7853a64 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h
>> [...]
> > @@ -1206,14 +1865,231 @@ struct ec_params_force_idle {
> > [...]
> > +/*
> > + * Known param numbers are defined here. Ranges are reserved for board-specific
> > + * params, which are handled by the particular implementations.
> > + */
> > +enum charge_state_params {
> > +	CS_PARAM_CHG_VOLTAGE,	      /* charger voltage limit */
> > +	CS_PARAM_CHG_CURRENT,	      /* charger current limit */
> > +	CS_PARAM_CHG_INPUT_CURRENT,   /* charger input current limit */
> > +	CS_PARAM_CHG_STATUS,	      /* charger-specific status */
> > +	CS_PARAM_CHG_OPTION,	      /* charger-specific options */
> > +	/* How many so far? */
> > +	CS_NUM_BASE_PARAMS,
> > +
> > +	/* Range for CONFIG_CHARGER_PROFILE_OVERRIDE params */

CONFIG_CHARGER_PROFILE_OVERRIDE doesn't match anything in linux-next. Is
a Kconfig symbol CHARGER_PROFILE_OVERRIDE perhaps queued somewhere?

> > +	CS_PARAM_CUSTOM_PROFILE_MIN = 0x10000,
> > +	CS_PARAM_CUSTOM_PROFILE_MAX = 0x1ffff,
> > +

I guess so, because these two constants aren't used anywhere.

> > +	/* Other custom param ranges go here... */
> > +};
> > [...]

Thanks,


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/