linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clocksource: arch_arm_timer: Fix timecounter initialization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:58:01 -0700
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	"Li.Xiubo@...escale.com" <Li.Xiubo@...escale.com>
CC:	Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource: arch_arm_timer: Fix timecounter initialization

On 06/12/14 00:45, Li.Xiubo@...escale.com wrote:
>
> And if so, why not just set it to 0 ? And by the way, 0 is must here ?
>
>

I would just set it to 0 and be done with it. But all of this doesn't
seem very urgent. The only user of this timecounter is using it for the
read() and mult/shift members. We never call timecounter_read() or
timecounter_cyc2time() so the nsec member is irrelevant.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/