linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] DMA, CMA: clean-up log message

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:11:19 +0530
From:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
Cc:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] DMA, CMA: clean-up log message

Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com> writes:

> We don't need explicit 'CMA:' prefix, since we already define prefix
> 'cma:' in pr_fmt. So remove it.
>
> And, some logs print function name and others doesn't. This looks
> bad to me, so I unify log format to print function name consistently.
>
> Lastly, I add one more debug log on cma_activate_area().
>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c b/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
> index 83969f8..bd0bb81 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ void __init dma_contiguous_reserve(phys_addr_t limit)
>  	}
>
>  	if (selected_size && !dma_contiguous_default_area) {
> -		pr_debug("%s: reserving %ld MiB for global area\n", __func__,
> +		pr_debug("%s(): reserving %ld MiB for global area\n", __func__,
>  			 (unsigned long)selected_size / SZ_1M);

Do we need to do function(), or just function:. I have seen the later
usage in other parts of the kernel.

>
>  		dma_contiguous_reserve_area(selected_size, selected_base,
> @@ -163,8 +163,9 @@ static int __init cma_activate_area(struct cma *cma)
>  	unsigned i = cma->count >> pageblock_order;
>  	struct zone *zone;
>
> -	cma->bitmap = kzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	pr_debug("%s()\n", __func__);

why ?

>
> +	cma->bitmap = kzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!cma->bitmap)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -234,7 +235,8 @@ int __init dma_contiguous_reserve_area(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t base,
>
>  	/* Sanity checks */
>  	if (cma_area_count == ARRAY_SIZE(cma_areas)) {
> -		pr_err("Not enough slots for CMA reserved regions!\n");
> +		pr_err("%s(): Not enough slots for CMA reserved regions!\n",
> +			__func__);
>  		return -ENOSPC;
>  	}
>
> @@ -274,14 +276,15 @@ int __init dma_contiguous_reserve_area(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t base,
>  	*res_cma = cma;
>  	cma_area_count++;
>
> -	pr_info("CMA: reserved %ld MiB at %08lx\n", (unsigned long)size / SZ_1M,
> -		(unsigned long)base);
> +	pr_info("%s(): reserved %ld MiB at %08lx\n",
> +		__func__, (unsigned long)size / SZ_1M, (unsigned long)base);
>
>  	/* Architecture specific contiguous memory fixup. */
>  	dma_contiguous_early_fixup(base, size);
>  	return 0;
>  err:
> -	pr_err("CMA: failed to reserve %ld MiB\n", (unsigned long)size / SZ_1M);
> +	pr_err("%s(): failed to reserve %ld MiB\n",
> +		__func__, (unsigned long)size / SZ_1M);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/