linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Qualcomm Resource Power Manager driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:15:10 -0700
From:	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@...o.se>
To:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Qualcomm Resource Power Manager driver

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org> wrote:
> +Paul Walmsley
>
> Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com> writes:
>
>> This series adds a regulator driver for the Resource Power Manager found in
>> Qualcomm 8660, 8960 and 8064 based devices.
>>
>> The RPM driver exposes resources to its child devices, that can be accessed to
>> implement drivers for the regulators, clocks and bus frequency control that's
>> owned by the RPM in these devices.
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>>   - Fix copy-paste error in dt binding
>>   - Correct incomplete move from mfd to soc
>>   - Correct const mistake in regulator driver
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>>   - Moved rpm driver to drivers/soc
>
> I'm not sure I follow the motivation for having this under drivers/soc?
>
Hi Kevin,

I've made the argument that to me this is conceptually a black box
handling regulators, clocks and other stuff; hence similar to a PMIC,
which would fit nicely into drivers/mfd.

I still think this is the case and now that I look back I didn't get
any pushback from Lee Jones so maybe the move was premature?

Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/