linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan.c: fix an implementation flaw in proportional scanning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 Jun 2014 17:08:52 +0800
From:	Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com>
To:	Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, minchan@...nel.org, mgorman@...e.de,
	hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...e.cz, riel@...hat.com,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan.c: fix an implementation flaw in proportional
 scanning

On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 11:00 +0200, Jerome Marchand wrote:
> >               if (!nr_file || !nr_anon)
> >                       break;
> >  
> > -             if (nr_file > nr_anon) {
> > -                     unsigned long scan_target =
> targets[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON] +
> >
> -                                             targets[LRU_ACTIVE_ANON]
> + 1;
> > +             file_percent = nr_file * 100 / file_target;
> > +             anon_percent = nr_anon * 100 / anon_target;
> 
> Here it could happen.
> 
> 
The snippet 
	...
               if (!nr_file || !nr_anon)
                      break;
        ...
 can help us to filter the situation which you have described. It comes
from Mel's patch that is called:

mm: vmscan: use proportional scanning during direct reclaim and full
scan at DEF_PRIORITY

thx!
cyc

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/