lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:22:34 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
cc:	"Yang,Wei" <Wei.Yang@...driver.com>, <balbi@...com>,
	<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB:gadget: Fix a warning while loading g_mass_storage

On Wed, 18 Jun 2014, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 18 2014, Yang,Wei wrote:
> > On 06/17/2014 10:18 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> >> That is a strange question to ask.  If you did not know that I approved
> >> the patch, why did you insert my Acked-By:?
> 
> > I added your Acked-By, as when you reviewed V3, you mentioned that I 
> > *may* add your Acked-by in this patch. If I misunderstood your point, I 
> > am so sorry for that.
> 
> Alan's point is that if you have any doubts whether someone approves
> your patch you should *not* add their Acked-by.  So adding someone's
> Acked-by and then asking if they are fine with the patch is
> contradictory -- the former indicates that you believe the person is
> fine with the patch, while the latter shows that you aren't.
> 
> Alan wrote:
> 
> >>> With that change, you may add
> >>>
> >>> Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
> 
> so after adding “that change” you are in your right to add Alan's
> Acked-by, but what that also means is that Alan will be fine with the
> patch if you make the requested change, so you don't need to ask for an
> opinion again.
> 
> PS. Note that “having any doubts” also means that if someone gave you
>     their Acked-by, but then you substantially rewrite the patch, you
>     probably should consider removing their Acked-by.

Exactly so.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ