| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 13:56:46 -0500 From: Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org> To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, Sagar Dharia <sdharia@...eaurora.org>, Daniel Sneddon <dsneddon@...eaurora.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com> Subject: Re: [Patch v2 1/3] spi: qup: Remove chip select function On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 11:13:03AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 02:34:10PM -0500, Andy Gross wrote: > > This patch removes the chip select function. Chip select should instead be > > supported using GPIOs, defining the DT entry "cs-gpios", and letting the SPI > > core assert/deassert the chip select as it sees fit. > > Why? The chip select control inside the controller is buggy. It is supposed to automatically assert the chip select based on the activity in the controller, but it is buggy and doesn't work at all. So instead we elect to use GPIOs. -- sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists