linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Tux3 for review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Jun 2014 17:31:49 -0700
From:	Daniel Phillips <daniel@...nq.net>
To:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Tux3 for review

On Sunday, June 22, 2014 11:34:50 AM PDT, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 08:32:03PM -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote:
>>> That's a bit disingenuous: the concern has always been how page forking
>>> interacted with writeback.  It's not new, it was one of the major 
things
>>> brought up at LSF 14 months ago, so you weren't just assigned this.
>> 
>> [citation needed]
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/548091/

Thank you Ted, and also thank you for providing an example worth emulating
of collegial behavior on LKML.

Regards,

Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/