linux-kernel - [PATCH -mm] slab: set free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:28:36 +0400
From:	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
To:	<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	<iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, <cl@...ux.com>, <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	<penberg@...nel.org>, <hannes@...xchg.org>, <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: [PATCH -mm] slab: set free_limit for dead caches to 0

We mustn't keep empty slabs on dead memcg caches, because otherwise they
will never be destroyed.

Currently, we check if the cache is dead in free_block and drop empty
slab if so irrespective of the node's free_limit. This can be pretty
expensive. So let's avoid this additional check by zeroing nodes'
free_limit for dead caches on kmem_cache_shrink. This way no additional
overhead is added to free hot path.

Note, since ->free_limit can be updated on cpu/memory hotplug, we must
handle it properly there.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Suggested-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
---
 mm/slab.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
index b35bf2120b96..6009e44a4d1d 100644
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -1155,11 +1155,13 @@ static int init_cache_node_node(int node)
 			cachep->node[node] = n;
 		}
 
-		spin_lock_irq(&n->list_lock);
-		n->free_limit =
-			(1 + nr_cpus_node(node)) *
-			cachep->batchcount + cachep->num;
-		spin_unlock_irq(&n->list_lock);
+		if (!memcg_cache_dead(cachep)) {
+			spin_lock_irq(&n->list_lock);
+			n->free_limit =
+				(1 + nr_cpus_node(node)) *
+				cachep->batchcount + cachep->num;
+			spin_unlock_irq(&n->list_lock);
+		}
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -1193,7 +1195,8 @@ static void cpuup_canceled(long cpu)
 		spin_lock_irq(&n->list_lock);
 
 		/* Free limit for this kmem_cache_node */
-		n->free_limit -= cachep->batchcount;
+		if (!memcg_cache_dead(cachep))
+			n->free_limit -= cachep->batchcount;
 		if (nc)
 			free_block(cachep, nc->entry, nc->avail, node);
 
@@ -2544,6 +2547,12 @@ int __kmem_cache_shrink(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
 
 	check_irq_on();
 	for_each_kmem_cache_node(cachep, node, n) {
+		if (memcg_cache_dead(cachep)) {
+			spin_lock_irq(&n->list_lock);
+			n->free_limit = 0;
+			spin_unlock_irq(&n->list_lock);
+		}
+
 		drain_freelist(cachep, n, slabs_tofree(cachep, n));
 
 		ret += !list_empty(&n->slabs_full) ||
@@ -3426,8 +3435,7 @@ static void free_block(struct kmem_cache *cachep, void **objpp, int nr_objects,
 
 		/* fixup slab chains */
 		if (page->active == 0) {
-			if (n->free_objects > n->free_limit ||
-			    memcg_cache_dead(cachep)) {
+			if (n->free_objects > n->free_limit) {
 				n->free_objects -= cachep->num;
 				/* No need to drop any previously held
 				 * lock here, even if we have a off-slab slab
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/