linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.14 066/110] ARM: stacktrace: avoid listing stacktrace functions in stacktrace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 28 Jun 2014 10:47:03 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 3.14 066/110] ARM: stacktrace: avoid listing stacktrace functions in stacktrace

3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>

commit 3683f44c42e991d313dc301504ee0fca1aeb8580 upstream.

While debugging the FEC ethernet driver using stacktrace, it was noticed
that the stacktraces always begin as follows:

 [<c00117b4>] save_stack_trace_tsk+0x0/0x98
 [<c0011870>] save_stack_trace+0x24/0x28
 ...

This is because the stack trace code includes the stack frames for itself.
This is incorrect behaviour, and also leads to "skip" doing the wrong
thing (which is the number of stack frames to avoid recording.)

Perversely, it does the right thing when passed a non-current thread.  Fix
this by ensuring that we have a known constant number of frames above the
main stack trace function, and always skip these.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c |   18 +++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -83,13 +83,16 @@ static int save_trace(struct stackframe
 	return trace->nr_entries >= trace->max_entries;
 }
 
-void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace)
+/* This must be noinline to so that our skip calculation works correctly */
+static noinline void __save_stack_trace(struct task_struct *tsk,
+	struct stack_trace *trace, unsigned int nosched)
 {
 	struct stack_trace_data data;
 	struct stackframe frame;
 
 	data.trace = trace;
 	data.skip = trace->skip;
+	data.no_sched_functions = nosched;
 
 	if (tsk != current) {
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -102,7 +105,6 @@ void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_st
 			trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = ULONG_MAX;
 		return;
 #else
-		data.no_sched_functions = 1;
 		frame.fp = thread_saved_fp(tsk);
 		frame.sp = thread_saved_sp(tsk);
 		frame.lr = 0;		/* recovered from the stack */
@@ -111,11 +113,12 @@ void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_st
 	} else {
 		register unsigned long current_sp asm ("sp");
 
-		data.no_sched_functions = 0;
+		/* We don't want this function nor the caller */
+		data.skip += 2;
 		frame.fp = (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0);
 		frame.sp = current_sp;
 		frame.lr = (unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0);
-		frame.pc = (unsigned long)save_stack_trace_tsk;
+		frame.pc = (unsigned long)__save_stack_trace;
 	}
 
 	walk_stackframe(&frame, save_trace, &data);
@@ -123,9 +126,14 @@ void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_st
 		trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = ULONG_MAX;
 }
 
+void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace)
+{
+	__save_stack_trace(tsk, trace, 1);
+}
+
 void save_stack_trace(struct stack_trace *trace)
 {
-	save_stack_trace_tsk(current, trace);
+	__save_stack_trace(current, trace, 0);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(save_stack_trace);
 #endif


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/