linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv7 0/5] Common Mailbox Framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 30 Jun 2014 18:16:20 +0200
From:	Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
To:	Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	mporter@...aro.org, patches@...aro.org, bjorn@...o.se,
	ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	s-anna@...com, loic.pallardy@...com, lftan.linux@...il.com,
	slapdau@...oo.com.au, courtney.cavin@...ymobile.com, pa@...per.es
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 0/5] Common Mailbox Framework

Hi Jassi,

On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 22:28 +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
> Hello,
>   Here is the next revision of Mailbox framwork.

I'm wondering whether you keep a Git tree with the framework we could
keep the Raspberry Pi mailbox driver based on (bcm2835-mbox)?

Also, from look at the API it does not seem to me that it's possible to
synchronously (that is without a tx_done callback) collect a response
when a message is sent with tx_block enabled. Equivalent to this: [1]

	bcm_mailbox_write(MBOX_CHAN_FB, vc4->mode_set_cmd_addr);
	bcm_mailbox_read(MBOX_CHAN_FB, &val);

[1] https://github.com/anholt/linux/commit/d6276826c1e94d942bd9f9dd4586b52197f13fb7#diff-fe03b88eaabd67668dcf9e116346793fR184

What's your opinion on that?

Regards,
Lubo

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/