linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Introduce ARM GICv2m MSI(-X) support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:27:25 -0400
From:	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
To:	Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
Cc:	marc.zyngier@....com, Catalin.Marinas@....com, Will.Deacon@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	Liviu.Dudau@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Introduce ARM GICv2m MSI(-X) support

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 07:19:26PM -0500, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote:
> On 6/24/2014 7:26 AM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 07:32:58PM -0500, suravee.suthikulpanit@....com wrote:
> >>This patch set introduces support for MSI(-X) in GICv2m specification,
> >>which is implemented in some variation of GIC400.
> >>
> >>This depends on and has been tested with the V7 of "Add support for PCI in AArch64"
> >>(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/14/320).
> >
> >Is this a build, boot, or runtime dependency?
> >
> 
> For all of the above.

Ok, the gic change in #1 should be a trivial conflict to resolve, so
it'll be easiest for you guys to merge this with the other code you have
going into arm-soc.

Just keep me in the Cc and I'll Ack it when it's ready.

thx,

Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/