| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 16:09:17 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] headers: remove fs.h from poll.h On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > fs.h inclusion is unnecessary because it is only needed > for "struct file" forward declaration. > > Those fs.h inclusions are fixing inevitable compilation failures. > There maybe more compilation failures. > > What I did to get 2000 number is: > * make allmodconfig > * make > * touch include/linux/fs.h > * make > * [count how many files were rebuilt] > > After more header tweaking the number of files that were rebuilt dropped > by ~2000 but code still compiles, which means fs.h inclusions were useless. > Lots of #ifdefs in fs.h, I hope your series includes building for all possible combinations. > This is first patch in series. Same thing we did with sched.h earlier. > Is it possible to post the whole series together so it makes sense and it's possible to put it through some thorough build testing? If you can point me to a git tree that I can pull, then I can do that on infrastructure that I have probably quicker than most. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists