linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add reset controllers for STiH407 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 03 Jul 2014 11:20:48 +0200
From:	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To:	Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com>
Cc:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	srinivas.kandagatla@...il.com, patrice.chotard@...com,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add reset controllers for STiH407 SoC

Hi,

Am Donnerstag, den 03.07.2014, 10:06 +0200 schrieb Maxime Coquelin:
> I will queue patch 4 to STi DT branch for v3.17.
> For now, no nodes uses reset for STiH407, so we don't need the 
> dt-bindings header file in the STi tree.
> 
> If we have a DT node using a reset line before my pull-request, I might 
> have to integrate the series in the STi DT branch.
> Philipp, does that sound reasonable?

Patch 4 depends on patch 1 for the header. My tree is still empty, how
about I take the first two, and you merge that branch and then take 3
and 4 on top?

    git://git.pengutronix.de/git/pza/linux.git reset/for_v3.17

Lee, shall I also add your Ack to the documentation patch?

regards
Philipp

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/