lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 4 Jul 2014 12:50:28 +0000
From:	Varun Sethi <Varun.Sethi@...escale.com>
To:	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
CC:	"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/3] iommu/fsl: Fix the device domain attach condition.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joerg Roedel [mailto:joro@...tes.org]
> Sent: Friday, July 04, 2014 4:25 PM
> To: Sethi Varun-B16395
> Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org; alex.williamson@...hat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iommu/fsl: Fix the device domain attach
> condition.
> 
> Hmm,
> 
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 07:27:16PM +0530, Varun Sethi wrote:
> > -	old_domain_info = find_domain(dev);
> > +	old_domain_info = dev->archdata.iommu_domain;
> >  	if (old_domain_info && old_domain_info->domain != dma_domain) {
> >  		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
> >  		detach_device(dev, old_domain_info->domain);
> 
> Wouldn't this set dev->archdata.iommu_domain to NULL anyway, so that ...
> 
Not for the case where device has multiple LIODNs.

> > @@ -399,7 +394,7 @@ static void attach_device(struct fsl_dma_domain
> *dma_domain, int liodn, struct d
> >  	 * the info for the first LIODN as all
> >  	 * LIODNs share the same domain
> >  	 */
> > -	if (!old_domain_info)
> > +	if (!dev->archdata.iommu_domain)
> >  		dev->archdata.iommu_domain = info;
> 
> We already know that it _must_ be NULL here?
> 

That won't be true for devices having multiple LIODNs

> >  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
> 
> This would shrink down the patch to:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu_domain.c
> b/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu_domain.c index 93072ba..d21b554 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu_domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu_domain.c
> @@ -399,8 +399,7 @@ static void attach_device(struct fsl_dma_domain
> *dma_domain, int liodn, struct d
>  	 * the info for the first LIODN as all
>  	 * LIODNs share the same domain
>  	 */
> -	if (!old_domain_info)
> -		dev->archdata.iommu_domain = info;
> +	dev->archdata.iommu_domain = info;

For devices having multiple LIODNs, we don't want to overwrite the info.

-Varun

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ