linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: S5PV210 platform clean-up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 5 Jul 2014 10:16:10 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: S5PV210 platform clean-up

On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com> wrote:
> This huge series is a (hopefully final) attempt to convert Samsung S5PV210
> into a DT-only and multiplatform-aware platform. It consists of several
> steps to gradually replace legacy code with one meeting current standards
> and then finally remove unused remnants.
>
> Patches 1-6 migrate the platform to fully use the Common Clock Framework
> and get rid of legacy private clock code, of which s5pv210 was the last
> user. Then patch 7 adds generic PHY driver for USB PHY on S5PV210 to allow
> USB to be supported when using DT. Further three patches (8-10) add DT
> support for mach-s5pv210 and necessary DT sources for currently supported
> boards. Patch 11 removes board files and code directly related to them,
> effectively making s5pv210 a DT-only platform. In next step, patches 12-15
> prepare remaining code for multiplatform enablement, which is finally done
> in patch 16. Patches 17-19 are a final clean-up, which remove a lot of
> unused code left after making the last S5P platform DT-only.
>
> Build tested patch by patch on following configs:
>  - s3c2410_defconfig (with DT support enabled),
>  - s3c6400_defconfig (with DT support enabled),
>  - s5pv210_defconfig (with DT support enabled after patches adding it),
>  - exynos_defconfig,
>  - exynos_defconfig with S5PV210 enabled in multiplatform configuration.
>
> Boot tested on s5pv210-goni board.
>
> Note that support for smdkc110, smdkv210 and torbreck boards is provided
> by moving data from existing board files to new device tree sources. No
> testing was performed due to mentioned board not being available anymore.
> However I believe we agreed on this approach, because apparently there
> are no active users of them. See the RFC from August 2013 asking for
> removal of the whole platform [1].
>
> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc%40vger.kernel.org/msg21882.html

> Tomasz Figa (13):
>   cpufreq: s3c24xx: Remove some dead code
>   cpufreq: s5pv210: Make the driver multiplatform aware

Looks like you used --suppress-cc=all while sending these and none of
CPUFreq/PM guys received it :(

Anyways, for cpufreq part:

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/