lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 06 Jul 2014 09:18:12 -0700
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Sebastien Buisson <sebastien.buisson@...l.net>
Cc:	<viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow increasing the buffer-head per-CPU LRU size

Sebastien Buisson <sebastien.buisson@...l.net> writes:

> Allow increasing the buffer-head per-CPU LRU size to allow efficient
> filesystem operations that access many blocks for each transaction.
> For example, creating a file in a large ext4 directory with quota
> enabled will accesses multiple buffer heads and will overflow the LRU
> at the default 8-block LRU size:

I don't think that should be a user visible config. Most users wouldn't
know how to set it. And Linux already has far too many obscure
config options.

Either make it set implicitely by the file system config.
Or just increase it unconditionally? 

-Andi


-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ