[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 10:30:52 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>,
"open list:GENERIC INCLUDE/A..." <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>,
"Clark, Rob" <robdclark@...il.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...gle.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Updated fence patch series
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:23:17PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >> Android can expose fences to userspace. It's possible to make the new fence
> >> mechanism expose the same fences to userspace by changing sync_fence_create
> >> to take a struct fence instead of a struct sync_pt. No other change is needed,
> >> because only the fence parts of struct sync_pt are used. But because the
> >> userspace fences are a separate problem and I haven't really looked at it yet
> >> I feel it should stay in staging, for now.
> >
> > Ok, that's reasonable.
> >
> > At first glance, this all looks "sane" to me, any objection from anyone
> > if I merge this through my driver-core tree for 3.17?
>
> Ack from my side fwiw.
Thanks, I'll queue it up later today.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists