| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 15:24:21 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: mingo@...nel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, sbw@....edu, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/4] documentation: Add acquire/release barriers to pairing rules From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> It is possible to pair acquire and release barriers with other barriers, so this commit adds them to the list in the SMP barrier pairing section. Reported-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> --- Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt index a6ca533a73fc..2a7c3c4fb53f 100644 --- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt +++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt @@ -757,10 +757,12 @@ SMP BARRIER PAIRING When dealing with CPU-CPU interactions, certain types of memory barrier should always be paired. A lack of appropriate pairing is almost certainly an error. -A write barrier should always be paired with a data dependency barrier or read -barrier, though a general barrier would also be viable. Similarly a read -barrier or a data dependency barrier should always be paired with at least an -write barrier, though, again, a general barrier is viable: +A write barrier should always be paired with a data dependency barrier, +acquire barrier, release barrier, or read barrier, though a general +barrier would also be viable. Similarly a read barrier or a data +dependency barrier should always be paired with at least a write barrier, +an acquire barrier, or a release barrier, though, again, a general +barrier is viable: CPU 1 CPU 2 =============== =============== -- 1.8.1.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists