linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 3/6] x86-mce: Clear CMCI enable on all claimed CMCI banks before reboot.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 Jul 2014 20:36:35 +0000
From:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:	Havard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...gle.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Ewout van Bekkum" <ewout@...gle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/6] x86-mce: Clear CMCI enable on all claimed CMCI
 banks before reboot.

+	if (!xchg(&reboot_notifier_registered, true))
+		register_reboot_notifier(&cmci_reboot_notifier);

This is super-safe ... but isn't the xchg() overkill? I thought we serialized bringup
of other cpus.

Has this "do it once" caught on elsewhere in the kernel ... I suppose it is more concise than

	if (!reboot_notifier_registered) {
		reboot_notifier_registered = 1;
		register_reboot_notifier(&cmci_reboot_notifier);
	}

-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/