linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/14] cpufreq: cpu0: Move per-cluster initialization code to ->init()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 Jul 2014 11:26:04 -0400
From:	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
	Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas P Abraham <thomas.ab@...sung.com>,
	Arvind Chauhan <arvind.chauhan@....com>,
	Sachin Kamat <spk.linux@...il.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] cpufreq: cpu0: Move per-cluster initialization
 code to ->init()

On Wednesday 09 July 2014 11:17 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 9 July 2014 20:23, Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com> wrote:
>> I scanned this patch and subsequent patches from the series. Since you are
>> modifying the interfaces and bindings, I just think its better if we can
>> address the cases where separate clock lines will be used by CPUs.
>>
>> Surely don't want to increase your work neither want hold the progress
>> of the series but if you look at the changes to the interfaces, they
>> give you a feeling of incompleteness.
> 
> Lets talk in the other thread you raised, 2/14 ..
> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>> Would you able to give some idea about what will it take to address that one
>> remainder case as well as part of this series.
> 
> Which one? This:
> 
>> We still *don't* support platforms with separate clock/voltage lines for CPUs.
>> This would be done in a separate patch.
> 
> Its already fixed as part of this series.
> 
I suggest you word the commit in that case. Saying subsequent patch
adds support for the remainder case. Let me scan the remainder
patches again to see how its done.

Regards,
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/