lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 15 Jul 2014 16:17:26 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 28/44] ring-buffer: Check if buffer exists before polling

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>

commit 8b8b36834d0fff67fc8668093f4312dd04dcf21d upstream.

The per_cpu buffers are created one per possible CPU. But these do
not mean that those CPUs are online, nor do they even exist.

With the addition of the ring buffer polling, it assumes that the
caller polls on an existing buffer. But this is not the case if
the user reads trace_pipe from a CPU that does not exist, and this
causes the kernel to crash.

Simple fix is to check the cpu against buffer bitmask against to see
if the buffer was allocated or not and return -ENODEV if it is
not.

More updates were done to pass the -ENODEV back up to userspace.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5393DB61.6060707@oracle.com

Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 include/linux/ring_buffer.h |    2 +-
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c  |    5 ++++-
 kernel/trace/trace.c        |   25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
 kernel/trace/trace.h        |    4 ++--
 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/ring_buffer.h
+++ b/include/linux/ring_buffer.h
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ __ring_buffer_alloc(unsigned long size,
 	__ring_buffer_alloc((size), (flags), &__key);	\
 })
 
-void ring_buffer_wait(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu);
+int ring_buffer_wait(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu);
 int ring_buffer_poll_wait(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu,
 			  struct file *filp, poll_table *poll_table);
 
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ static void rb_wake_up_waiters(struct ir
  * as data is added to any of the @buffer's cpu buffers. Otherwise
  * it will wait for data to be added to a specific cpu buffer.
  */
-void ring_buffer_wait(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
+int ring_buffer_wait(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
 {
 	struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
 	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
@@ -557,6 +557,8 @@ void ring_buffer_wait(struct ring_buffer
 	if (cpu == RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS)
 		work = &buffer->irq_work;
 	else {
+		if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, buffer->cpumask))
+			return -ENODEV;
 		cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu];
 		work = &cpu_buffer->irq_work;
 	}
@@ -591,6 +593,7 @@ void ring_buffer_wait(struct ring_buffer
 		schedule();
 
 	finish_wait(&work->waiters, &wait);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /**
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -1027,13 +1027,13 @@ update_max_tr_single(struct trace_array
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE */
 
-static void default_wait_pipe(struct trace_iterator *iter)
+static int default_wait_pipe(struct trace_iterator *iter)
 {
 	/* Iterators are static, they should be filled or empty */
 	if (trace_buffer_iter(iter, iter->cpu_file))
-		return;
+		return 0;
 
-	ring_buffer_wait(iter->trace_buffer->buffer, iter->cpu_file);
+	return ring_buffer_wait(iter->trace_buffer->buffer, iter->cpu_file);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_FTRACE_STARTUP_TEST
@@ -4054,17 +4054,19 @@ tracing_poll_pipe(struct file *filp, pol
  *
  *     Anyway, this is really very primitive wakeup.
  */
-void poll_wait_pipe(struct trace_iterator *iter)
+int poll_wait_pipe(struct trace_iterator *iter)
 {
 	set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 	/* sleep for 100 msecs, and try again. */
 	schedule_timeout(HZ / 10);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /* Must be called with trace_types_lock mutex held. */
 static int tracing_wait_pipe(struct file *filp)
 {
 	struct trace_iterator *iter = filp->private_data;
+	int ret;
 
 	while (trace_empty(iter)) {
 
@@ -4074,10 +4076,13 @@ static int tracing_wait_pipe(struct file
 
 		mutex_unlock(&iter->mutex);
 
-		iter->trace->wait_pipe(iter);
+		ret = iter->trace->wait_pipe(iter);
 
 		mutex_lock(&iter->mutex);
 
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+
 		if (signal_pending(current))
 			return -EINTR;
 
@@ -5011,8 +5016,12 @@ tracing_buffers_read(struct file *filp,
 				goto out_unlock;
 			}
 			mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock);
-			iter->trace->wait_pipe(iter);
+			ret = iter->trace->wait_pipe(iter);
 			mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock);
+			if (ret) {
+				size = ret;
+				goto out_unlock;
+			}
 			if (signal_pending(current)) {
 				size = -EINTR;
 				goto out_unlock;
@@ -5224,8 +5233,10 @@ tracing_buffers_splice_read(struct file
 			goto out;
 		}
 		mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock);
-		iter->trace->wait_pipe(iter);
+		ret = iter->trace->wait_pipe(iter);
 		mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out;
 		if (signal_pending(current)) {
 			ret = -EINTR;
 			goto out;
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ struct tracer {
 	void			(*stop)(struct trace_array *tr);
 	void			(*open)(struct trace_iterator *iter);
 	void			(*pipe_open)(struct trace_iterator *iter);
-	void			(*wait_pipe)(struct trace_iterator *iter);
+	int			(*wait_pipe)(struct trace_iterator *iter);
 	void			(*close)(struct trace_iterator *iter);
 	void			(*pipe_close)(struct trace_iterator *iter);
 	ssize_t			(*read)(struct trace_iterator *iter,
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ void trace_init_global_iter(struct trace
 
 void tracing_iter_reset(struct trace_iterator *iter, int cpu);
 
-void poll_wait_pipe(struct trace_iterator *iter);
+int poll_wait_pipe(struct trace_iterator *iter);
 
 void ftrace(struct trace_array *tr,
 			    struct trace_array_cpu *data,


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ