linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] random,x86: Add arch_get_slow_rng

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Jul 2014 12:15:41 -0700
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Cc:	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
	kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] random,x86: Add arch_get_slow_rng_u64

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
<hannes@...essinduktion.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014, at 19:34, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:12:27AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Unless I'm reading the code wrong, the prandom_reseed_late call can
>> >> happen after userspace is running.
>> >
>> > But there is also the prandom_reseed() call, which happens early.
>> >
>>
>> Right -- I missed that.
>
> prandom_init is a core_initcall, prandom_reseed is a late_initcall.
> During initialization of the network stack we have calls to prandom_u32
> before the late_initcall happens. That said, I think it is not that
> important to seed prandom with rdseed/rdrand as security relevant
> entropy extraction should always use get_random_bytes(), but we should
> do it nonetheless.
>

Regardless, I don't want to do this as part of this patch series.  One
thing at a time...

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/