| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 09:45:55 -0700 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>, Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>, Scott J Norton <scott.norton@...com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] futex: introduce an optimistic spinning futex Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> writes: > Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com> writes: > >> This patch series introduces two new futex command codes to support >> a new optimistic spinning futex for implementing an exclusive lock >> primitive that should perform better than the same primitive using >> the wait-wake futex in cases where the lock owner is actively working >> instead of waiting for I/O completion. > > How would you distinguish those two cases automatically? Also BTW traditionally the spinning was just done in user space. This would be always even more efficient, because it would even avoid the syscall entry path. Given the glibc adaptive mutexes are not very good, but I'm sure those could be improved. -Andi -- ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists