lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 25 Jul 2014 02:24:34 -0400
From:	Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
To:	Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	"open list:READ-COPY UPDATE..." <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] rcu: Use rcu_gp_kthread_wake() to wake up kthreads

On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:06 AM, Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com> wrote:

>
> In rcu_report_qs_rsp(), I added a pr_info() call testing if any of the above
> conditions is true, in which case we can avoid calling wake_up(). It turns out
> that quite a few actually are. Most of the cases where we can avoid is condition 2
> above and condition 1 also occurs quite often. Condition 3 never happens.
>

A little more data. On an idle system there are about 2000 unnecessary
wake_up() calls every 5 minutes with the most common trace being the
follows:

[Fri Jul 25 02:05:49 2014]  [<ffffffff8109f7c5>] rcu_report_qs_rnp+0x285/0x2c0
[Fri Jul 25 02:05:49 2014]  [<ffffffff81838c09>] ? schedule_timeout+0x159/0x270
[Fri Jul 25 02:05:49 2014]  [<ffffffff8109fa21>] force_qs_rnp+0x111/0x190
[Fri Jul 25 02:05:49 2014]  [<ffffffff810a02c0>] ? synchronize_rcu_bh+0x50/0x50
[Fri Jul 25 02:05:49 2014]  [<ffffffff810a2e5f>] rcu_gp_kthread+0x85f/0xa70
[Fri Jul 25 02:05:49 2014]  [<ffffffff81086060>] ? __wake_up_sync+0x20/0x20
[Fri Jul 25 02:05:49 2014]  [<ffffffff810a2600>] ? rcu_barrier+0x20/0x20
[Fri Jul 25 02:05:49 2014]  [<ffffffff8106b4fb>] kthread+0xdb/0x100
                  [<ffffffff8106b420>]?kthread_create_on_node+0x180/0x180
[Fri Jul 25 02:05:49 2014]  [<ffffffff81839dac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
                  [<ffffffff8106b420>] ?kthread_create_on_node+0x180/0x180

With rcutorture, there are about 2000 unnecessary wake_ups() every 3
minutes with the most common trace being:

[Fri Jul 25 02:18:30 2014]  [<ffffffff8109f7c5>] rcu_report_qs_rnp+0x285/0x2c0
[Fri Jul 25 02:18:30 2014]  [<ffffffff81078b15>] ? __update_cpu_load+0xe5/0x140
                 [<ffffffffa09dc230>] ?rcu_read_delay+0x50/0x80 [rcutorture]
                 [<ffffffff810a3728>]rcu_process_callbacks+0x6b8/0x7e0


-- 
Pranith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ