linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] (Was: procfs: silence lockdep warning about read vs. exec seq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Aug 2014 16:55:03 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc:	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] (Was: procfs: silence lockdep warning about read
	vs. exec seq_file)

On 08/04, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 11:18:43PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > Absolutely untested, only for review.
> >
> > What do you all think?
>
> Look good. And works for me.

OK, thanks Kirill and Cyrill ;)

I'll try to recheck, update the changelogs and resend after the testing,
hopefully tomorrow.

> task_nommu.c need to be covered too, I believe.

Yes, I know, thanks. I'd prefer to make a separate patch or two, simply
because I can't test the changes in nommu. The only question is how much
should I try to avoid the copy-and-paste... probably I won't try at all.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/