linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ACPI/Processor: Add CPU_STARTING_FROZEN check in the acpi_cpu_soft

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 06 Aug 2014 03:30:21 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
Cc:	lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI/Processor: Add CPU_STARTING_FROZEN check in the acpi_cpu_soft_notify()

On Friday, August 01, 2014 10:51:46 AM Lan Tianyu wrote:
> On 2014年08月01日 05:20, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 31, 2014 05:20:26 PM Lan Tianyu wrote:
> >> The callback of CPU_STARTING event can't sleep and so acpi_cpu_soft_notify()
> >> return directly when CPU_STARTING event is triggered. But cpu hotplug also
> >> happens during S2RAM. The action will become CPU_STARTING_FROZEN. This
> >> patch is to fix missing check the frozen event.

OK

What's the impact of the bug you're fixing?  Do we sleep when we shouldn't?

In particular, are there any bugs reported that are related to it?

> >> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
> > 
> > There is work to restructure the handling of CPU_TASKS_FROZEN under way
> > and Chen Gong is driving it.  That's likely to conflict with the last
> > two patches from you.  Can you please coordinate with Gong?
> 
> Hi Rafael:
> 
> Thanks for reminder. I just checked Chen Gong's patchset "Gloabl CPU
> Hot-plug flag _FROZEN Clean up". There is no conflict between our
> patches. Gong's patch is to remove the following macro.
> 
> CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN
> CPU_UP_PREPARE_FROZEN
> CPU_UP_CANCELED_FROZEN
> CPU_DOWN_PREPARE_FROZEN
> CPU_DOWN_FAILED_FROZEN
> CPU_DEAD_FROZEN
> CPU_DYING_FROZEN
> CPU_STARTING_FROZEN
> 
> CPU_TASKS_FROZEN is still available and the CPU events during S2RAM
> are still (CPU_xxx | CPU_TASKS_FROZEN).

OK

> BTW, this is a bug fix from my opinion and it should be backported to
> stable tree.

We'll see.


> >> ---
> >>  drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c | 2 +-
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
> >> index 4fcbd67..66e2249 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
> >> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static int acpi_cpu_soft_notify(struct notifier_block *nfb,
> >>  	 * CPU_STARTING and CPU_DYING must not sleep. Return here since
> >>  	 * acpi_bus_get_device() may sleep.
> >>  	 */
> >> -	if (action == CPU_STARTING || action == CPU_DYING)
> >> +	if ((action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) == CPU_STARTING || action == CPU_DYING)
> >>  		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> >>  
> >>  	if (!pr || acpi_bus_get_device(pr->handle, &device))
> >>
> > 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/