[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 14:55:33 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: Dmitry Popov <ixaphire@...tor.net>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Weird NET_RX softirq behavior
On Thu, 7 Aug 2014 22:47:58 -0700
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-08-08 at 10:37 +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > nd and recive 7 packets so far, about 1400bytes. Seems small
> > comparing with the CPU1 and CPU2 NET_RX softirq numbers, right?
> >
> > Any other possible case?
>
> Multicast loop. Check dev_loopback_xmit() and its callers.
>
>
That's it! This make sense
I didn't see any NET_RX on CPU1,2,3 if I disabled mulitcast
Thanks very much.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists