linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] drm: rework flip-work framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 12 Aug 2014 13:14:07 +0200
From:	Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] drm: rework flip-work framework

Hi,

On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 16:06:06 +0200
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> This patch series reworks the flip-work framework to make it safe when
> calling drm_flip_work_queue from atomic contexts.
> 
> The 2nd patch of this series is optional, as it only reworks
> drm_flip_work_init prototype to remove unneeded size argument and
> return code (this function cannot fail anymore).


Atmel HLCDC driver now depends on this series and I'd like to get as
much thing as possible for HLCDC support in 3.18 (if the driver can't
make it for 3.18, at least the dependencies could).

David, Rob (and other DRM/KMS developers) do you have any concern you
would like addressed in this patch series ?

Best Regards,

Boris


-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/