lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 14 Aug 2014 18:55:35 -0400
From:	Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, dvhart@...ux.intel.com,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 tip/core/rcu 12/16] rcu: Make TASKS_RCU handle
 nohz_full= CPUs

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Currently TASKS_RCU would ignore a CPU running a task in nohz_full=
> usermode execution.  There would be neither a context switch nor a
> scheduling-clock interrupt to tell TASKS_RCU that the task in question
> had passed through a quiescent state.  The grace period would therefore
> extend indefinitely.  This commit therefore makes RCU's dyntick-idle
> subsystem record the task_struct structure of the task that is running
> in dyntick-idle mode on each CPU.  The TASKS_RCU grace period can
> then access this information and record a quiescent state on
> behalf of any CPU running in dyntick-idle usermode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/init_task.h |  3 ++-
>  include/linux/sched.h     |  2 ++
>  kernel/rcu/tree.c         |  2 ++
>  kernel/rcu/tree.h         |  2 ++
>  kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h  | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/rcu/update.c       |  4 +++-
>  6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/init_task.h b/include/linux/init_task.h
> index 78715ea7c30c..642828009324 100644
> --- a/include/linux/init_task.h
> +++ b/include/linux/init_task.h
> @@ -128,7 +128,8 @@ extern struct group_info init_groups;
>  #define INIT_TASK_RCU_TASKS(tsk)                                       \
>         .rcu_tasks_holdout = false,                                     \
>         .rcu_tasks_holdout_list =                                       \
> -               LIST_HEAD_INIT(tsk.rcu_tasks_holdout_list),
> +               LIST_HEAD_INIT(tsk.rcu_tasks_holdout_list),             \
> +       .rcu_tasks_idle_cpu = -1,
>  #else
>  #define INIT_TASK_RCU_TASKS(tsk)
>  #endif
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 3cf124389ec7..5fa041f7a034 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1277,6 +1277,7 @@ struct task_struct {
>         unsigned long rcu_tasks_nvcsw;
>         int rcu_tasks_holdout;
>         struct list_head rcu_tasks_holdout_list;
> +       int rcu_tasks_idle_cpu;
>  #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU */
>
>  #if defined(CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS) || defined(CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT)
> @@ -2021,6 +2022,7 @@ static inline void rcu_copy_process(struct task_struct *p)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU
>         p->rcu_tasks_holdout = false;
>         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->rcu_tasks_holdout_list);
> +       p->rcu_tasks_idle_cpu = -1;
>  #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU */
>  }
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 645a33efc0d4..0d9ee1e4f446 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -526,6 +526,7 @@ static void rcu_eqs_enter_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval,
>         atomic_inc(&rdtp->dynticks);
>         smp_mb__after_atomic();  /* Force ordering with next sojourn. */
>         WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&rdtp->dynticks) & 0x1);
> +       rcu_dynticks_task_enter();
>
>         /*
>          * It is illegal to enter an extended quiescent state while
> @@ -642,6 +643,7 @@ void rcu_irq_exit(void)
>  static void rcu_eqs_exit_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval,
>                                int user)
>  {
> +       rcu_dynticks_task_exit();
>         smp_mb__before_atomic();  /* Force ordering w/previous sojourn. */
>         atomic_inc(&rdtp->dynticks);
>         /* CPUs seeing atomic_inc() must see later RCU read-side crit sects */
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> index 0f69a79c5b7d..37ff593b7725 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> @@ -579,6 +579,8 @@ static void rcu_sysidle_report_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp, int isidle,
>  static void rcu_bind_gp_kthread(void);
>  static void rcu_sysidle_init_percpu_data(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp);
>  static bool rcu_nohz_full_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp);
> +static void rcu_dynticks_task_enter(void);
> +static void rcu_dynticks_task_exit(void);
>
>  #endif /* #ifndef RCU_TREE_NONCORE */
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> index a86a363ea453..0d8ef5cb1976 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> @@ -2852,3 +2852,19 @@ static void rcu_bind_gp_kthread(void)
>                 set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(cpu));
>  #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL */
>  }
> +
> +/* Record the current task on dyntick-idle entry. */
> +static void rcu_dynticks_task_enter(void)
> +{
> +#if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> +       ACCESS_ONCE(current->rcu_tasks_idle_cpu) = smp_processor_id();
> +#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */

Shouldn't we check that the cpu is actually a nohz_full cpu, like follows:

 static void rcu_dynticks_task_enter(void)
 {
 #if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
-       ACCESS_ONCE(current->rcu_tasks_idle_cpu) = smp_processor_id();
+       if (tick_nohz_full_cpu(smp_processor_id())
+                 ACCESS_ONCE(current->rcu_tasks_idle_cpu) = smp_processor_id();
 #endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
 }

> +}
> +
> +/* Record no current task on dyntick-idle exit. */
> +static void rcu_dynticks_task_exit(void)
> +{
> +#if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> +       ACCESS_ONCE(current->rcu_tasks_idle_cpu) = -1;
> +#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
> +}
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/update.c b/kernel/rcu/update.c
> index d997163c7e92..a4140f25cf1a 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/update.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/update.c
> @@ -466,7 +466,9 @@ static void check_holdout_task(struct task_struct *t,
>  {
>         if (!ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_tasks_holdout) ||
>             t->rcu_tasks_nvcsw != ACCESS_ONCE(t->nvcsw) ||
> -           !ACCESS_ONCE(t->on_rq)) {
> +           !ACCESS_ONCE(t->on_rq) ||
> +           (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) &&
> +            !is_idle_task(t) && t->rcu_tasks_idle_cpu >= 0)) {

rcu_tasks_idle_cpu will be -1 in CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL is not enabled. Why
are you checking both here?

>                 ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_tasks_holdout) = 0;
>                 list_del_rcu(&t->rcu_tasks_holdout_list);
>                 put_task_struct(t);
> --
> 1.8.1.5
>



-- 
Pranith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ