lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 17 Aug 2014 12:06:48 +0200
From:	Ethan Wilson <ethan.wilson@...ftmail.org>
To:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: How to get kernel stack trace if process not blocked?

Hello list,
cat /proc/pid/stack shows the kernel call stack of a process, and this 
is so good, but it will show just 0xffffffffffffffff if the process is 
running in kernel space and not blocked (sleeping).
With just an 0xffffffffffffffff  AFAIU it is also impossible to 
distinguish a process running in kernel space from a process running in 
user space.

It would be *very* useful to get the kernel stack trace for a running 
process, even if imprecise, or at least knowing the name of the kernel 
function executing now (top of the stack). Why is it not doable?

I tried to disable CONFIG_SCHED_OMIT_FRAME_POINTER but it didn't allow 
to print the stack from /proc/pid/stack anyway. What is the benefit of 
disabling such kernel option (i.e. having the frame pointer)?

I guessed that maybe with EIP from /proc/pid/stat it is possible to do 
something like that but I can't find much information on how to do that.

Thanks for any information
EW

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists