lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 18 Aug 2014 20:58:28 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: slub/debugobjects: lockup when freeing memory

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:44:34PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> 
> > > > So call rcu activates the object, but the object has no reference in
> > > > the debug objects code so the fixup code is called which inits the
> > > > object and allocates a reference ....
> > >
> > > So we need to init the object in the page struct before the __call_rcu?
> >
> > And the needed APIs are now in mainline:
> >
> > 	void init_rcu_head(struct rcu_head *head);
> > 	void destroy_rcu_head(struct rcu_head *head);
> >
> > Over to you, Christoph!  ;-)
> 
> The field we are using for the rcu head serves other purposes before
> the free action. We cannot init the field at slab creation as we
> thought since it is used for the queueing of slabs on the partial, free
> and full lists. The kmem_cache information is not available when doing
> the freeing so we must force the allocation of reserve fields and the
> use of the reserved areas for rcu on all kmem_caches.

Yow!  I am glad I didn't try doing this myself!

> I made this conditional on CONFIG_RCU_XYZ. This needs to be the actual
> Debug options that will require allocations when initializing rcu heads.
> 
> Also note that the allocations in the rcu head initialization must be
> restricted to non RCU slabs otherwise the recursion may not terminate.
> 
> 
> Subject RFC: Allow allocations on initializing rcu fields in slub.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> 
> Index: linux/mm/slub.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/mm/slub.c
> +++ linux/mm/slub.c
> @@ -1308,6 +1308,41 @@ static inline struct page *alloc_slab_pa
>  	return page;
>  }
> 
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_DEBUG_XYZ

If you make CONFIG_RCU_DEBUG_XYZ instead be CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD,
then it will automatically show up when it needs to.

The rest looks plausible, for whatever that is worth.

							Thanx, Paul

> +/*
> + * We may have to do alloations during the initialization of the
> + * debug portion of the rcu structure for a slab. It must therefore
> + * be separately allocated and initized on allocation.
> + * We cannot overload the lru field in the page struct at all.
> + */
> +#define need_reserve_slab_rcu 1
> +#else
> +/*
> + * Overload the lru field in struct page if it fits.
> + * Should struct rcu_head grow due to debugging fields etc then
> + * additional space will be allocated from the end of the slab to
> + * store the rcu_head.
> + */
> +#define need_reserve_slab_rcu						\
> +	(sizeof(((struct page *)NULL)->lru) < sizeof(struct rcu_head))
> +#endif
> +
> +static struct rcu_head *get_rcu_head(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page)
> +{
> +	if (need_reserve_slab_rcu) {
> +		int order = compound_order(page);
> +		int offset = (PAGE_SIZE << order) - s->reserved;
> +
> +		VM_BUG_ON(s->reserved != sizeof(struct rcu_head));
> +		return page_address(page) + offset;
> +	} else {
> +		/*
> +		 * RCU free overloads the RCU head over the LRU
> +		 */
> +		return (void *)&page->lru;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
>  {
>  	struct page *page;
> @@ -1357,6 +1392,21 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct
>  			kmemcheck_mark_unallocated_pages(page, pages);
>  	}
> 
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_DEBUG_XYZ
> +	if (unlikely(s->flags & SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU) && page)
> +		/*
> +		 * Initialize rcu_head and potentially do other
> +		 * allocations. Note that this is still a recursive
> +		 * call into the allocator which may recurse endlessly
> +		 * if the same kmem_cache is used for allocation here.
> +		 *
> +		 * So in order to be safe the slab caches used
> +		 * in init_rcu_head must be restricted to be of the
> +		 * non rcu kind only.
> +		 */
> +		init_rcu_head(get_rcu_head(s, page));
> +#endif
> +
>  	if (flags & __GFP_WAIT)
>  		local_irq_disable();
>  	if (!page)
> @@ -1452,13 +1502,13 @@ static void __free_slab(struct kmem_cach
>  	memcg_uncharge_slab(s, order);
>  }
> 
> -#define need_reserve_slab_rcu						\
> -	(sizeof(((struct page *)NULL)->lru) < sizeof(struct rcu_head))
> -
>  static void rcu_free_slab(struct rcu_head *h)
>  {
>  	struct page *page;
> 
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_DEBUG_XYZ
> +	destroy_rcu_head(h);
> +#endif
>  	if (need_reserve_slab_rcu)
>  		page = virt_to_head_page(h);
>  	else
> @@ -1469,24 +1519,9 @@ static void rcu_free_slab(struct rcu_hea
> 
>  static void free_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page)
>  {
> -	if (unlikely(s->flags & SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU)) {
> -		struct rcu_head *head;
> -
> -		if (need_reserve_slab_rcu) {
> -			int order = compound_order(page);
> -			int offset = (PAGE_SIZE << order) - s->reserved;
> -
> -			VM_BUG_ON(s->reserved != sizeof(*head));
> -			head = page_address(page) + offset;
> -		} else {
> -			/*
> -			 * RCU free overloads the RCU head over the LRU
> -			 */
> -			head = (void *)&page->lru;
> -		}
> -
> -		call_rcu(head, rcu_free_slab);
> -	} else
> +	if (unlikely(s->flags & SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU))
> +		call_rcu(get_rcu_head(s, page), rcu_free_slab);
> +	else
>  		__free_slab(s, page);
>  }
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ