linux-kernel - Re: Oops: 17 SMP ARM (v3.16-rc2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Aug 2014 10:39:09 +0100
From:	Iain Paton <ipaton0@...il.com>
To:	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
CC:	Mattis Lorentzon <Mattis.Lorentzon@...oliv.com>,
	Fredrik Noring <fredrik.noring@...oliv.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Oops: 17 SMP ARM (v3.16-rc2)

On 19/08/14 07:03, Iain Paton wrote:
> On 17/08/14 22:46, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>> Iain,
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Iain Paton <ipaton0@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On 15/08/14 06:42, Mattis Lorentzon wrote:
>>>
>>>> We mostly run SSH with benchmarks using NFS, it can probably be
>>>> triggered by using only SSH with the following loop:
>>>>
>>>> # while : ; do ssh arm-card date; done
>>>
>>> Mattis,
>>>
>>> What sort of time does it take for you to see a problem?
>>>
>>> I've been running the above for nearly two days on 3.16.0 on a board
>>> with fec interrupts routed through gpio_6 and haven't seen a hint of
>>> a problem.
>>
>> Thanks for testing.
>>
>> Which mx6 board have you used on this test?
> 
> It's currently pointed at a RIoTboard (atheros phy) but I'm happy to 
> try it against both a Sabre-Lite and a Wandboard B1, all running the 
> same kernel binary, as well. 
> 
> I'm interested enough in why different people get different results 
> with this that I'll put some time towards testing to try to help 
> narrow down the cause.
> 

two and a half days of running this against both a sabre-lite and a 
wandboard quad B1 and I still have no reason to think there's any 
sort of a problem.

Up to now, my testing has been done with my own config, I'll now
repeat the whole thing using the config Mattis posted to see if 
I can reproduce it that way.

Suggestions on a better / easier / quicker way to reproduce it are 
welcome.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/