linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] jump_label: tidy jump_label

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Aug 2014 10:58:18 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
From:	"Zhouyi Zhou" <yizhouzhou@....ac.cn>
To:	"Jason Baron" <jbaron@...mai.com>
Cc:	"Zhouyi Zhou" <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>, drjones@...hat.com,
	konrad.wilk@...cle.com, raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	mingo@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, hannes@...essinduktion.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] jump_label: tidy jump_label_ratelimit.h

Thanks Jason for reviewing it 
> -----Original Messages-----
> From: "Jason Baron" <jbaron@...mai.com>
> Sent Time: Thursday, August 21, 2014
> To: "Zhouyi Zhou" <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>
> Cc: drjones@...hat.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com, raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, hannes@...essinduktion.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Zhouyi Zhou" <yizhouzhou@....ac.cn>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] jump_label: tidy jump_label_ratelimit.h
> 
> Yes, that looks good. While at it I grep'd the tree for
> 'CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL', and found some uses in the
> netfilter code which should probably be
> 'HAVE_JUMP_LABEL' as well.
I have submitted two patches according to you suggestions:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/20/885
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/20/883
Hope I have made them right

Thanks 
Zhouyi
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Jason
> 
> On 08/20/2014 05:29 AM, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
> > jump_label_ratelimit.h is split from jump_label.h to enable the 
> > includers who don't want linux/workqueue.h.
> > As HAVE_JUMP_LABEL is only defined in jump_label.h, will following  
> > patch makes jump_labe_ratelimit.h more tidy?
> >
> > Compiled and Tested in x86_64
> > Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <yizhouzhou@....ac.cn>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h |    5 +----
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h b/include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h
> > index 089f70f..0d34d7e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h
> > @@ -4,15 +4,12 @@
> >  #include <linux/jump_label.h>
> >  #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> >  
> > -#if defined(CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO) && defined(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL)
> > +#ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
> >  struct static_key_deferred {
> >  	struct static_key key;
> >  	unsigned long timeout;
> >  	struct delayed_work work;
> >  };
> > -#endif
> > -
> > -#ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
> >  extern void static_key_slow_dec_deferred(struct static_key_deferred *key);
> >  extern void
> >  jump_label_rate_limit(struct static_key_deferred *key, unsigned long rl);
> 




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/