linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86, fpu: copy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Aug 2014 14:25:13 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@...il.com>,
	Bean Anderson <bean@...lsystems.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86, fpu: copy_process's FPU paths cleanups

On 08/28, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>
> > Oleg, this is unacceptable.
> >
> > Last week was Kernel Summit and that was right on the heels of
> > a merge window.  We are backlogged like crazy and being rude
> > doesn't help one iota.
>
> Also, the previous set of patches was under active review by
> Linus with objections, we very much wanted to wait for all that
> to conclude one way or another.

Sorry for confusion. But this series and the previous fixes do not
depend on that set of patches.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/