linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v1 2/5] mfd: lpc_sch: better code manageability with chipset info struct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 2 Sep 2014 00:17:17 +0000
From:	"Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun" <rebecca.swee.fun.chang@...el.com>
To:	'Andy Shevchenko' <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 2/5] mfd: lpc_sch: better code manageability with
 chipset info struct



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Shevchenko [mailto:andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com]
> Sent: 01 September, 2014 6:25 PM
> To: Lee Jones
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Samuel Ortiz; Chang, Rebecca
> Swee Fun
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] mfd: lpc_sch: better code manageability with
> chipset info struct
> 
> On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 10:16 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Aug 2014, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > > Introduce additional struct to hold chipset info. This chipset info
> > > will be used to store features that are supported by specific
> > > processor or chipset. LPC_SCH supports SMBUS, GPIO and WDT features.
> > > As this code base might expand further to support more processors,
> > > this implementation will help to keep code base clean and manageable.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chang Rebecca Swee Fun
> > > <rebecca.swee.fun.chang@...el.com>
> > > Tested-by: Chang Rebecca Swee Fun <rebecca.swee.fun.chang@...el.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> []
> 
> 
> > The first patch would look a great deal cleaner if it had these
> > changes in too.  Unless you have a really good reason not to, please
> > consider squashing them.
> 
> The only reason behind is that this patch (in other form) was written by
> Rebecca in the first place. I recommended to clean up before, and actually did
> that clean up and amended Rebecca's patch.
> 
> So, if Rebecca has now objections I could squash it.

I have no objections. Thanks.

> 
> 
> --
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com> Intel Finland Oy