linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET REPOST percpu/for-3.18] percpu: implement atomic allocation support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 2 Sep 2014 14:50:05 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, cl@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	laijs@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	vgoyal@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET REPOST percpu/for-3.18] percpu: implement atomic
 allocation support

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 12:53:04PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> (the initial posting was missing cc's, reposting)
> 
> Due to the use of vmalloc area allocations and page table populations,
> preparing percpu areas require GFP_KERNEL and all the allocator users
> are expected to be able to perform GFP_KERNEL allocations.  This is
> mostly okay but there are cases where atomic percpu allocations are
> necessary usually in the IO path.
> 
> Currently, blk-throttle is implementing its own ad-hoc async
> allocation and there are some more planned similar usages.  I posted
> [1] percpu_pool which generalizes the percpu atomic allocation a bit
> but this was a bit too cumbersome especially to use with other library
> data structures which make use of percpu memory as a part of it.
> 
> This patchset implements proper atomic allocation support in the
> percpu allocator.  It's largely composed of two parts.  The first is
> updates to the area allocator so that it can skip non-populated areas.
> The second is async filling mechanisms which try to maintain a certain
> level of empty populated areas.  The allocator currently tries to keep
> the number of empty populated pages between 2 and 4.  Even with fairly
> aggressive back-to-back allocations, this seems enough to satisfy most
> allocations as long as the allocation size is under a page.

1-2 applied to percpu/for-3.17-fixes.  The rest applied to
percpu/for-3.18.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/