linux-kernel - Re: [SMP BUG?] the return value of is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 2 Sep 2014 04:40:44 +0000 (UTC)
From:	Leon Yu <"Leon Yu"@ccca.nctu.edu.tw>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [SMP BUG?] the return value of is_smp() is bug?

On 2014-09-01, Wang Long <long.wanglong@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,all
>
> In kernel 3.17-rc2, when i set CONFIG_HAVE_SMP = y and CONFIG_SMP_ON_UP = y 
> in .config file. the secondary core can not boot.
>
> when i set CONFIG_HAVE_SMP = y and CONFIG_SMP_ON_UP = n in .config file,
> the secondary core can boot.
>
> But this does not happen in kernel 3.10 lts kernel, Whether the 
> CONFIG_SMP_ON_UP is set yes or no ,the secondary core can boot.
>
> Does the meaning of CONFIG_SMP_ON_UP changed or this is a bug in kernel3.17-rc2 ? 

Update qemu to at least 2.0.

qemu of older version fails to smp-boot Linux 3.12+ with CONFIG_SMP_ON_UP
enabled.

-Leon

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/