linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86: efi: format EFI memory type & attrs with efi_md_typeattr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 3 Sep 2014 13:07:51 +0100
From:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To:	Laszlo Ersek <lersek@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, matt.fleming@...el.com,
	msalter@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86: efi: format EFI memory type & attrs with
 efi_md_typeattr_format()

On Mon, 01 Sep, at 02:53:38AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@...hat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

I know this is a straight forward patch in the context of this series,
but you need to include a rationale, so that we know in 6 months, 12
months and 5 years from now why this change made sense.

Something like,

  "Reduce the amount of duplicated code by using the helper function"

would be fine.

-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/