linux-kernel - Re: regression caused by cgroups optimization in 3.17-rc2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 02 Sep 2014 20:15:05 -0700
From:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
To:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: regression caused by cgroups optimization in 3.17-rc2

On 09/02/2014 06:33 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> kfree isn't eating 56% of "all cpu time" here, and it wasn't clear to
> me whether Dave filtered symbols from only memcontrol.o, memory.o, and
> mmap.o in a similar way.  I'm not arguing against the regression, I'm
> just trying to make sense of the numbers from the *patched* kernel.

I guess I could have included it in the description, but that was a
pretty vanilla run:

	perf top --call-graph=fp --stdio > foo.txt

I didn't use any filtering.  I didn't even know I _could_ filter. :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/