| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 19:08:48 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> To: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM> CC: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>, "linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, "linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, Miroslav Franc <mfranc@...hat.com>, Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: bit fields && data tearing On 09/04/2014 05:59 PM, Peter Hurley wrote: > I have no idea how prevalent the ev56 is compared to the ev5. > Still we're talking about a chip that came out in 1996. Ah yes, I stand corrected. According to Wikipedia, the affected CPUs were all the 2106x CPUs (EV4, EV45, LCA4, LCA45) plus the 21164 with no suffix (EV5). However, we're still talking about museum pieces here. I wonder what the one I have in my garage is... I'm sure I could emulate it faster, though. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists