linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] perf/x86: add support for sampling PEBS machine state registers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 5 Sep 2014 05:20:23 +0200
From:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@...il.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] perf/x86: add support for sampling PEBS machine
 state registers

On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed,  3 Sep 2014 16:59:07 +0200
> Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com> wrote:
>
>> PEBS can capture machine state regs at retiremnt of the sampled
>> instructions. When precise sampling is enabled on an event, PEBS
>> is used, so substitute the interrupted state with the PEBS state.
>> Note that not all registers are captured by PEBS. Those missing
>> are replaced by the interrupt state counter-parts.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c |   17 +++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
>> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c index 9dc4199..139a8a5
>> 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
>> @@ -886,6 +886,23 @@ static void __intel_pmu_pebs_event(struct
>> perf_event *event, regs.bp = pebs->bp;
>>       regs.sp = pebs->sp;
>>
>> +     if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR) {
>> +             regs.ax = pebs->ax;
>> +             regs.bx = pebs->bx;
>> +             regs.cx = pebs->cx;
>> +             regs.si = pebs->si;
>> +             regs.di = pebs->di;
>> +
>> +             regs.r8 = pebs->r8;
>> +             regs.r9 = pebs->r9;
>> +             regs.r10 = pebs->r10;
>> +             regs.r11 = pebs->r11;
>> +             regs.r12 = pebs->r12;
>> +             regs.r13 = pebs->r13;
>> +             regs.r14 = pebs->r14;
>> +             regs.r14 = pebs->r15;
>                      ^^^
>                      r15 ???
>
Oops, good catch. I will fix in v5.
Thanks.

>> +     }
>> +
>>       if (event->attr.precise_ip > 1 &&
>> x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_format >= 2) { regs.ip = pebs->real_ip;
>>               regs.flags |= PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/