linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 11/13] mm, compaction: skip buddy pages by their order in the migrate scanner

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 08 Sep 2014 10:04:21 +0200
From:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 11/13] mm, compaction: skip buddy pages by their order
 in the migrate scanner

On 08/22/2014 12:11 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon,  4 Aug 2014 10:55:22 +0200 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> wrote:
>
>> The migration scanner skips PageBuddy pages, but does not consider their order
>> as checking page_order() is generally unsafe without holding the zone->lock,
>> and acquiring the lock just for the check wouldn't be a good tradeoff.
>>
>> Still, this could avoid some iterations over the rest of the buddy page, and
>> if we are careful, the race window between PageBuddy() check and page_order()
>> is small, and the worst thing that can happen is that we skip too much and miss
>> some isolation candidates. This is not that bad, as compaction can already fail
>> for many other reasons like parallel allocations, and those have much larger
>> race window.
>>
>> This patch therefore makes the migration scanner obtain the buddy page order
>> and use it to skip the whole buddy page, if the order appears to be in the
>> valid range.
>>
>> It's important that the page_order() is read only once, so that the value used
>> in the checks and in the pfn calculation is the same. But in theory the
>> compiler can replace the local variable by multiple inlines of page_order().
>> Therefore, the patch introduces page_order_unsafe() that uses ACCESS_ONCE to
>> prevent this.
>>
>> Testing with stress-highalloc from mmtests shows a 15% reduction in number of
>> pages scanned by migration scanner. The reduction is >60% with __GFP_NO_KSWAPD
>> allocations, along with success rates better by few percent.
>> This change is also a prerequisite for a later patch which is detecting when
>> a cc->order block of pages contains non-buddy pages that cannot be isolated,
>> and the scanner should thus skip to the next block immediately.
>
> What is this "later patch"?  Or is the changelog stale?

Yes it is stale, that later patch was postponed due to apparent bad 
effect on fragmentation. I guess we can drop the last paragraph from 
this commit log.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/