[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 16:21:14 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/sl[aou]b: make kfree() aware of error pointers
On Tue, 9 Sep 2014 23:25:28 +0200 (CEST) Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz> wrote:
> kfree() is happy to accept NULL pointer and does nothing in such case.
> It's reasonable to expect it to behave the same if ERR_PTR is passed to
> it.
>
> Inspired by a9cfcd63e8d ("ext4: avoid trying to kfree an ERR_PTR
> pointer").
>
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/slab.c
> +++ b/mm/slab.c
> @@ -3612,7 +3612,7 @@ void kfree(const void *objp)
>
> trace_kfree(_RET_IP_, objp);
>
> - if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(objp)))
> + if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(objp) || IS_ERR(objp)))
> return;
kfree() is quite a hot path to which this will add overhead. And we
have (as far as we know) no code which will actually use this at
present.
How about a new
kfree_safe(...)
{
if (IS_ERR(...))
return;
if (other-stuff-when-we-think-of-it)
return;
kfree(...);
}
?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists