[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 07:19:50 +0530
From: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Cc: Linux USB Mailing List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, kishon <kishon@...com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: Calibrate LOS levels for exynos5420/5800
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:53:09AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:01:19PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> >> > Don't we have phy_power_on()
>> >> > for that ? It looks like you could just as well do this from
>> >> > phy_power_on() ?
>> >>
>> >> No, unfortunately keeping these calibration settings in phy_power_on()
>> >> doesn't help, since we need to do this after XHCI reset has happened.
>> >
>> > teach xHCI about PHYs ?
>>
>> sorry i couldn't understand you here.
>> Aren't we trying to do the same with Heikki's patch about dwc3 :
>> [PATCH 6/6] usb: dwc3: host: convey the PHYs to xhci
>>
>> and the 2nd patch in this series :
>> [PATCH v6 2/4] usb: host: xhci-plat: Get PHYs for xhci's hcds
>>
>> Is there something else that is expected ?
>
> right, use that to call phy_init() at the right time, then you need to
> add a new ->calibrate() method which, likely, will only be used by you
> ;-)
so you mean, the xhci should itself call phy_init() at a time suitable,
so that ->calibrate() is not required at all ?
i think you meant there - "then you __do not__ need to
> add a new ->calibrate() method which, likely,
will only be used by you", is it ?
--
Best Regards
Vivek Gautam
Samsung R&D Institute, Bangalore
India
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists